Mumbai/New Delhi: Reliance Jio Infocomm informed the Supreme Court that it would be a “travesty” of the law if rival telcos are made to pay each other’s dues. In an affidavit in the top court on ...
Reliance Jio has moved the Supreme Court against the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) order to pay Rs 147 crore to Tata Telecom, as cable landing station usage charges. The ...
Jio said it did not agree with COAI's alarmist views that telecom sector will collapse in absence of immediate relief by the government. Billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio on Thursday strongly ...
Reflecting the ongoing war between telecom service providers to retain and add subscribers, Reliance Jio on Monday complained to the Supreme Court that the telecom appellate tribunal erroneously ...
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Friday sought the details of spectrum sharing pact between Reliance Communications (RCom) and Reliance Jio and said as to why the company using the spectrum of the other ...
Reliance Industries Chairperson Mukesh Ambani addresses the 9th edition of Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit-2019, in Gandhinagar.Photo/Santosh Hirlekar) (MUMBAI: The Supreme Court has held Reliance Jio ...
New Delhi: Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd's battle with rival Bharti Airtel Ltd over the latter's 'T20 Live and Free' advertisement campaign is now in the Supreme Court. The Mukesh Ambani-owned company on ...
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/bharti-jio-slapped-with-a-14400-crore-tax-bill-after-sc-judgement/article67429558.ece Copy Following the judgement of ...
The NDA government has defended the previous UPA regime’s granting of telecom licence to Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd, ruling out that the company had been allowed “backdoor entry.” The ...
New Delhi, Oct 31 () Strongly opposing a bailout of telecom companies at taxpayers' expense, Reliance Jio on Thursday wrote to Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad saying firms that have been ordered ...
We submit that these service providers are themselves responsible for this issue, they were aware of the government’s position and Supreme Court’s position as early as 2008 and 2011, however, in a ...